In what way might the 2013 decision by the Supreme Court in the Myriad decision that naturally occurring genes cannot be patented affect or trigger an IP audit??
What will be an ideal response?
If a company had a substantial portfolio of gene patents, all of these were thus declared invalid under Myriad. A company would wish to conduct an IP audit to determine the effect of this decision on its "bottom line" and determine whether any licenses it may have granted to allow others to use the now invalid gene patents are now unenforceable. Moreover, on the "other side," companies who previously were not conducting research and testing involving those gene patents (because they feared being sued for infringement by the gene patent owners) may now use the patents and engage in such activities.?
You might also like to view...
A parent is __________ when he or she demonstrates abuse or neglect that is substantially detrimental to a child.
Fill in the blank(s) with the appropriate word(s).
Answer the following statements true (T) or false (F)
1. Oral sex can never be rape. 2. Forcible Sodomy is a strict liability crime. 3. Adults can use the consent defense to forcible fondling charges even when the victim is a child. 4. Defendants have the right to cross-examine the technician who performed the DNA analysis at trial. 5. A man raped at gunpoint would be a rape victim under the Common Law definition of rape.
The consent defense to charges of rape is most likely to work in which situation?
A) The victim was intoxicated, having imbibed a fifth of vodka over an evening on the town. B) The victim is a relative aged 15. C) The victim was a woman of the cloth over age 75. D) The victim is a female aged 21. E) None of the above
A party can receive damages for an immaterial breach
Indicate whether the statement is true or false