The exclusionary rule operates differently in the confessions/interrogation context (compared to in the Fourth Amendment context). Explain the difference
What will be an ideal response?
Answer: Good answers should explain that in the Fourth Amendment context illegally obtained evidence and its derivatives are excluded from use as evidence. But with the Fourteenth Amendment, involuntary statements of physical evidence obtained in violation of Miranda are admissible. Students should incorporate United States v. Bayer and Michigan v. Tucker into their answers.
You might also like to view...
The Guttman method of devising attitude scales relies upon judges to select items
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
At what point does the law require a defendant be allowed the assistance of counsel?
A. as soon as the crime in question has been committed B. at any critical stage in the investigative process C. at the point of arrest D. at the beginning of the trial process (i.e., first appearance)
Which Supreme Court case ruled that trying a juvenile who had previously been adjudicated delinquent in juvenile court for the same crime as an adult in criminal court violates the double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment when the adjudication involves violation of a criminal statue?
a. Breed v. Jones (1975) b. Roper v. Simmons (2005) c. Kent v. United States (1966) d. McKeiver v. Pennsylvania (1971)
Bob robs Ray at gunpoint. He tells Ray, "One false move and I'll shoot!" This is an example of:
A) shield laws. B) aggravated battery. C) conditional assault. D) constructive touching.