"The norms of noninterference in the internal affairs of states are stronger than the norms against genocide." Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Why? Provide examples to support your answer.
What will be an ideal response?
The ideal answer should include:
1. Define noninterference and genocide.
2. Recall the implications of self-determination, sovereignty, intervention, social norms, dehumanization, and other key concepts around the two issues.
3. Explain why you agree or disagree with the notion that norms of noninterference in internal affairs of states are stronger than the norms against genocide.
4. Discuss how relevant examples, such as Rwanda, corroborate your answer.
5. Offer a compelling summary and effective conclusion.
You might also like to view...
Thomas Hobbes' argument that "life in the state of nature is a constant war of all against all" explains warfare with a combination of _____ approaches
a. socialist and liberal b. realist and cultural c. institutional and ideational d. psychological and rational-materialist
Of the presidents who have served since the Second World War, only five were elected twice
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) was created to give the president tighter control over the federal bureaucracy
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
What is the purpose of the White House Office?
What will be an ideal response?