Russell conducts an experiment to study children's theory of mind. He selects participants and divides them into two groups. The first group consists of 3-year-olds, whereas the second group consists of 5-year-olds. Russell takes a box of crayons and places candies in them. He opens the box and shows it to both groups. Next, he asks the first group what a child who has never seen the box will think is actually inside the box. The group replies, "Candies!" To the same question, the second group replies, "Crayons!" This scenario illustrates that

A. 3-year-old children have a deepening appreciation of the mind.
B. 5-year-old children believe that people's behaviors necessarily reflect their thoughts and feelings.
C. children refer to cognitive states earlier than they refer to desires.
D. children younger than 4 years old do not understand that it is possible to have a false belief.


Answer: D

Psychology

You might also like to view...

A young girl has recently developed an intense case of poison ivy. Which of her neurons are transmitting the messages of pain and itch to her brain?

A. Synaptic neurons B. Motor neurons C. Sensory neurons D. Association neurons

Psychology

Nina got a bad grade on her first exam. This led her to think she could never understand the material or pass the class. As a result, she quit going to class, and of course, failed. Bandura calls this interaction of belief, experience, and behavior:

a. self-efficacy b. self-monitoring c. reciprocal determinism d. conditions of worth

Psychology

In trying to understand why some ethnic neighborhoods are dominated by poverty, people often infer that the residents are lazy and unmotivated. This type of inference illustrates:

a. the fundamental attribution error b. a stable global attribution c. inverse discrimination d. a stable external attribution

Psychology

In ____________________, the Supreme Court held that the prosecution must disclose deals made with informants.

A. Giglio v. United States B. Minnesota v. White C. Brady v. Maryland D. Nix v. New Jersey

Psychology