On what basis did the Supreme Court decide in Bates that the bar could not prohibit lawyer advertising?
What will be an ideal response?
The State Bar of Arizona put forth six arguments against lawyers advertising the prices of standardized legal services. Ultimately, the Court decided that the arguments against such advertising failed in the face of the rebuttals. The key to understanding Bates is realizing that truthful information presented to the public about a lawyer’s services is protected, regardless of whether the Bar thinks it is undignified.
You might also like to view...
U.S. GAAP and IFRS view investments of less than 20% of the voting shares of another company as minority, passive investments in most cases
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
In formatting a report, you discover than an entire table will not fit on the bottom of a page; the best formatting decision would be to
a. place the table prior to the text reference to it if that placement will allow the entire table to appear on the page. b. begin the table, allow an adequate margin at the bottom of the page, and begin the next page with the continuation of the table. c. introduce the table, continue the graphic interpretation to the bottom of the page, and begin the next page with the table. d. end the page with the introduction to the table, regardless of the space on the page.
When a court orders specific performance, it:
A) Modifies the contract terms in order to maximize the fairness to both parties. B) Orders a party to a contract to do exactly what was called for in the contract. C) Orders a party to return any and all consideration received. D) Orders monetary damages to be paid by the breaching party to the nonbreaching party.
Refer to the data on Expected Demand for Acme Widgets. For the various demand scenarios, if you applied the Laplace criterion, what is the highest payoff?
a. $39.33 million
b. $23.33 million
c. $31.33 million
d. $43.33 million