In CASE 1.1 Sorrell v. IMS Health Inc, drug manufacturers challenged as unconstitutional a Vermont statute prohibiting pharmacies form selling prescriber-identifying information for marketing prescription drugs without the consent of prescribers. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that:
a. although speech promoting marketing was not protected by the First Amendment, the law was unconstitutional based on the due process clause.
b. the statute regulated commercial speech which was evaluated under an "intermediate" standard and that the law was, therefore, constitutional.
c. the statute did not involve constitutional issues and was, therefore, a permissible type of regulation.
d. the conduct prohibited by the law was protected by the First Amendment and that the law was unconstitutional.
d
You might also like to view...
Deposits made directly by the bank would be
A) added to the company's records. B) deducted from the company's records. C) added to the bank statement balance. D) deducted from the bank statement balance.
________ are simple correlations between the variables and the factors
A) Factor scores B) Factor loadings C) Correlation loadings D) Both A and B are correct
Forsyth, Inc. uses estimated direct labor hours of 245,000 and estimated manufacturing overhead costs of $1,200,000 in establishing its predetermined overhead allocation rate for the year. Actual results showed the following:
The number of direct labor hours worked during the period was ________. (Round any intermediate calculations to two decimal places, and your final answer to the nearest whole number.)
A) 245,000 hours
B) 168,367 hours
C) 163,265 hours
D) 237,575 hours
The corporate alternative minimum tax was designed to insure that corporations with substantial economic income paid their fair share of the federal tax burden.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)