Explain how efforts to control "quality of life" offenses highlight the tension between order and liberty in constitutional democracies
What will be an ideal response?
Constitutional democracy can't survive without order and liberty, but there's a natural tension between them because they're fundamental values in conflict. The U.S. Supreme Court has recognized the need to balance order and liberty by holding repeatedly that "ordered liberty" is a fundamental requirement of our constitutional system. One example of the tension can be seen in the need to control aggressive panhandling. Order demands that people not be accosted by others asking them for money but liberty demands that people have the freedom to ask others for money. Efforts to control this type of offense must balance the right to have order with the liberty to ask for money.
You might also like to view...
The first large scale scientific study of law enforcement practices was conducted in which American city?
a. New York b. Philadelphia c. Kansas City d. Boston
Correlation means a possible relationship between two variables
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
__________ advocates see themselves as protectors of civil rights
a. Crime control c. Due process b. Equal justice d. Nonintervention
Programs or policies designed to prevent juvenile delinquency that include police making an arrest as part of an operation to address gang problems are considered:
a. delinquency prevention b. randomized trials c. delinquency control d. experimental prevention