How are ad hoc plans, standing plans, and contingency plans different from one another? How are they similar?
What will be an ideal response?
Ad hoc plans are temporary plans designed to address specific situations. Standing plans are ongoing
and long-term plans designed to nurture important relationships. A danger of standing plans is that
they often stand too long and become a "tradition" divorced from their original values-driven goals.
Contingency plans are "what if" plans, designed to address a variety of situations that may arise.
Crisis communications plans are the best-known form of contingency plans. A common
characteristic of all plans is that they should be values-driven and should strive to fulfill the
organization's mission.
You might also like to view...
Adam saw a television program last night which gave him a topic idea for an upcoming speech. Is this ethically appropriate?
A) No; using televised information for your speech topic is a form of plagiarism. B) No; most topics discussed on talk shows are inappropriate speech material. C) Yes; getting ideas from television programs is an option suggested in the text. D) Yes, but you have to address the topic the same way the talk show did.
Recency theory recommends putting the strongest argument first in the body of your speech to establish a strong initial impression
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
This type of communication, according to functional group decision making, is considered the most important for making a group decision.
A. promotive B. disruptive C. counteractive D. socioemotional
Determine the BSA of a child who weighs 8.7 kg with a height of 51 cm using the BSA formula.
What will be an ideal response?