Louise and Tyrone are facing problems making personnel decisions at the restaurant they run because they are both brining in their professional relationship issues to the argument. Classify which are the two most relevant principles of negotiation to use here and why.
What will be an ideal response?
Louise and Tyrone should use principles 1 and 4, separate the people from the problem and insisting on using objective criteria, respectively. The two need to take their relationship issues out of the equation in order to work together and mutually confront the problem rather than focus on themselves. Likewise, objective criteria must be used like professional standards because that is the only fair and effective way to make personnel decision.
You might also like to view...
Study A investigated the effect of intelligence on the speed of completion of a problem-solving task. Study B investigated the effect of an early stimulating environment on the intelligence of children. The variable intelligence is the
a. independent variable in Study A and the dependent variable in Study B. b. dependent variable in Study A and the independent variable in Study B. c. independent variable in both Study A and Study B. d. dependent variable in both Study A and Study B.
Why is the distinction between academic and social behavior arbitrary?
a. because academic behavior is controlled by intelligence and social behavior is determined genetically b. because neither the academic or social behavior of handicapped children can be improved c. because children with both academic and social behavior problems come from single parent families d. because both academic and social behavior are governed by the same principles of learning and respond to similar interventions
The coordination of part-whole relationships involves the understanding that the whole can be broken into _______
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word
The deductive-inductive method is best described as a. a major collaborative effort of Aristotle and Francis Bacon. b. a method of reasoning which moves from the general assumption tothe specific application
c. a method of reasoning which moves from specific observations to ageneralization. d. a method of reasoning in which a hypothesis is tested by thecollection and logical analysis of data.