Scope of Services An apartment owner has contracted for lawn mowing services for a number of apartment complexes he owns. He negotiated a price per month but the scope of services to be performed remained a bit vague. Why is he disappointed that the winning contractor provides less than the desired level of services?
This is a moral hazard issue. Once the contract has been signed, the contractor has an incentive to exert as little effort as possible. So, for example, the lawn care service may not edge as often along a path that not much seen or that grows more slowly.
You might also like to view...
If MSC = 20 + 0.75A, where MSC is in millions of dollars, and A is the percentage of mercury emissions abatement, then
a. marginal social cost is $7.5 million when 10 percent of mercury emissions are abated b. the MSC function graphs with a horizontal intercept of 20 c. MSC equals $35 million if 20 percent of mercury is abated d. TSC must be declining with higher abatement levels
Refer to Figure 4.1. Simon's available strategies include
A) top and bottom. B) up and down. C) left and right. D) all of the above
A price ceiling, such as a rent ceiling
A) always results in a surplus. B) always results in a shortage. C) results in a surplus if the ceiling price is less than the equilibrium price. D) results in a shortage if the ceiling price is less than the equilibrium price.
The diagram below shows the production possibilities frontier (PPF) for a country that produces guns (G) and butter (B). Most people in the country prefer guns, so in the absence of international trade, point A represents the combination of G and B that maximizes welfare. The slope of the PPF at point A is equal to -2. 
Over the long run, do you think this country would be better off by shifting its production towards guns or butter? Please identify the most efficient production point in the PPF with trade. What would be the ratio of the prices at that point?
What will be an ideal response?