Evaluate the following argument in accordance with the criteria discussed in the text.See? When she has a good day at the store and sells lots of clothes, she always is in a good mood. It just shows you how effective a good mood can be in the sales business. The customer eats that stuff up.

What will be an ideal response?


Consider confusing cause and effect.

Philosophy & Belief

You might also like to view...

The conclusion of "No one should be surprised to learn that, in India, there is growing interest in space exploration. After all, there is growing interest in China too, and Indian and China have a lot in common!" is

A) No one should be surprised to learn that, in India, there is growing interest in space exploration B) There is growing interest in space exploration in China C) Indian and China have a lot in common

Philosophy & Belief

INSTRUCTIONS: Select the answer that best characterizes each argument. Adopt the Aristotelian standpoint. It is false that some teacups are flowerpots. Therefore, some teacups are not flowerpots

A) Valid; no fallacy. B) Invalid; illicit subcontrary. C) Invalid; illicit subalternation. D) Invalid; illicit conversion. E) Invalid; existential fallacy.

Philosophy & Belief

INSTRUCTIONS: In each problem below you are given a statement, its truth value in parentheses, and an operation/relation to be performed on that statement. You must identify the new statement and the truth value of the new statement. Adopt the Aristotelian standpoint and assume that 'A' and 'B' denote things that actually exist. Some A are not non-B. (F) Contradiction

A) All A are non-B. (T) B) Some A are non-B. (T) C) Some B are not non-A. (F) D) Some A are non-B. (T) E) Some A are B. (T)

Philosophy & Belief

INSTRUCTIONS: Select the best answer for each argument. Frank argues that it's not a good idea for underage people to drink alcoholic beverages. Apparently Frank wants everyone to be a teetotaler. Bring back prohibition for good-that's what Frank wants. But prohibition was a complete failure in the thirties. Obviously Frank's argument is misguided

A) Accident. B) Begging the question. C) No fallacy. D) Hasty generalization. E) Straw man.

Philosophy & Belief