Michele is desperate to sell her home and has entered into an agreement to sell to a known drug dealer who has made her an offer she can’t refuse. He informs her of his profession, that he is purchasing the house for his boss whose identity he cannot disclose, but that he is a major drug lord in Columbia. She goes through with the sale anyway. The dealer turns out to be an undercover FBI agent. Michele is charged with conspiracy to launder money. She believes this charge will not stick because she did not enter into an agreement with another legitimate party. Is she correct?
a. Yes, conspiracies must be bilateral.
b. No, unilateral conspiracies may exist with undercover agents providing the single individual agreed to enter into a conspiracy.
c. Yes, unilateral conspiracies may not exist with undercover agents providing a single individual agreed to enter into a conspiracy.
d. No, conspiracies regularly target individuals who have not actually entered into any agreement.
b. No, unilateral conspiracies may exist with undercover agents providing the single individual agreed to enter into a conspiracy.
You might also like to view...
In 45 states, judges have the discretion to transfer juveniles to adult courts through a waiver hearing.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
Discuss elderly inmates in prison
What will be an ideal response?
_________________ accept payoffs when their everyday duties place them in a position to "look the other way."
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word
Crime is solely an individual problem
a. True b. False