Which of the following accurately describes a difference between de jure and de facto segregation/discrimination in the United States?
a. De jure segregation/discrimination is now fairly rare; de facto segregation/discrimination is now fairly common.
b. De jure segregation/discrimination is generally constitutional; de facto segregation/discrimination is generally unconstitutional. –
c. De jure segregation/discrimination is fairly common now; de facto segregation/discrimination was fairly common during the civil rights movement.
d. De jure segregation/discrimination currently exists by race; de facto segregation/discrimination currently exists by gender.
a
You might also like to view...
What was the Supreme Court's ruling in United States v. Windsor?
A) It defined what marriage is and is not. B) It ruled that states do not have to recognize same-sex marriages. C) It ruled that states do not have to recognize same-sex marriages from other states. D) It ruled that federal discrimination against same-sex couples violated the Fourteenth Amendment.
An alternative theory to “punctuated equilibrium” is the concept of “muddling through.” In the context of policymaking, what is the meaning of this concept?
a. progress that is abruptly halted b. political and human factors result in compromise between Congress and the executive c. policymaking in the United States that is rigidly guarded as a process that always balances both sides of the debate d. stability that suddenly goes awry e. long periods of stability that are broken up by sudden and abrupt change
Which president started the trend of having an in-house pollster taking regular readings of the public pulse?
A. Dwight D. Eisenhower B. Harry Truman C. Bill Clinton D. Jimmy Carter
Explain the informal methods of amending the Constitution and why such methods are useful
What will be an ideal response?