Explain why the Supreme Court’s ruling in Branzburg v. Hayes prompted states to adopt shield laws.
What will be an ideal response?
Answers should include the following points: (1) The decision failing to find either a First Amendment or common law privilege to protect journalists from the obligation to testify was narrow and related only to journalists being subpoenaed to testify before grand juries. (2) The opinion did not clearly guide the determination of privilege in other contexts. (3) One concurring opinion and the dissenting opinions suggested that the Court might consider the existence of a reporter’s privilege outside of grand jury proceedings. (4) The decision could be interpreted as rejecting the existence of reporter’s privilege. Therefore, only shield laws could protect reporters’ sources, process, and work product.
You might also like to view...
The more both sides of a person’s face are similar to one another, the more attractive that person is judged. Which standard of physical beauty does this fact represent?
a. the principle of youthfulness b. the principle of symmetry c. the principle of proportionality d. the principle of averageness
Which component of the Toulmin Model of Argument answers the following questions, "How did you get there?" and "What gives you the right to draw that conclusion?"
a. claim b. evidence c. warrant d. reservation e. qualifier
Establishing ________ in your introduction is important in order to get your audience to believe you during the rest of your speech
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word
According to social penetration theory, when a relationship begins to deteriorate, the breadth and depth will, in many ways, reverse themselves, in a process called
A) withdrawal. B) social exchange. C) depenetration. D) empathy.