Has cross listing been beneficial for most listed companies? If yes, why doesn't every company cross-list?
What will be an ideal response?
It appears that cross-listing has mostly brought benefits for the firms that cross-list. However, firms for which cross-listing is not beneficial should, of course, not do so. The costs associated with cross-listing have to do with the direct costs of registration, the potentially higher costs of more demanding accounting and reporting requirements, and the increased scrutiny and corporate governance that may erode the private benefits of controlling managers. Clearly, not every firm will have an incentive to cross-list.
You might also like to view...
___________________ statements recast all items on the statement as a percentage of a selected item on the statement
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word
The working paper from which a meeting operates is called a(n) ______.
A. script B. policy C. procedural D. agenda
In a spendthrift trust, all control over the trust is removed from the beneficiary
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act is a product of: A) Congress
B) international trade agreements. C) state law. D) the Constitution.