Why is proving proximate harm cause important in the outcome of a professional negligence suit?
1. To identify if the harm could have been predicted to result from the action of the defendant
2. A direct line of causation, from incident to injury, is proved.
3. It determines how far the liability extends for consequences following negligent actions.
4. The need for expert witnesses is eliminated because harm can be approximated.
3
Rationale: Proximate cause attempts to determine if the defendant is liable for occurrences that happen after the negligent act occurred. Foreseeability is the concept that the harm that occurred could have been predicted as a result of the action of the defendant. The direct line of causation from incident to injury describes the concept of cause-in-fact. Even if the cause is determined, expert witnesses may be needed to testify on other aspects of the case such as practice standards.
You might also like to view...
The client complains of severe back pain and is excused from work. Later, he is seen water skiing and jogging. These behaviors describe
1. malingering. 2. somatization. 3. hypochondriasis. 4. a factitious disorder.
After a methamphetamine overdose, priority nursing and medical measures will center around
a. repeated lavage. b. acidification of urine. c. maintenance of nutrition and elimination. d. reduction of fever and prevention of seizures.
A nurse is teaching a patient and family about quality of life. Which information should the nurse include in the teaching session about quality of life?
a. It is deeply social. b. It is hard to define. c. It is an observed measurement for most people. d. It is consistent and stable over the course of one's lifetime.
A patient has undergone a total hysterectomy with vaginal repair. The nurse advises about careful intercourse and which over the counter product to decrease sexual discomfort related to intercourse?
a. Hydrocortisone cream b. Water-based lubricants c. Petroleum jelly d. Vit A & D ointment