Some opponents of affirmative action policies claim that affirmative action policies ultimately hurt the minorities they were designed to assist in the first place. What argument could you make to either defend or refute this position?
What will be an ideal response?
: Possible key points from the text:
Defense: engenders resentment among other groups and perpetuates stereotypes about the groups that undermine the minority group as a whole; “quotas” and outright reverse discrimination undermine the real achievements of members of underrepresented groups and perpetuate the notion that members of these groups intrinsically lack the characteristics for success in employment and will always need special assistance.
Refute: Proponents of these policies claim three main arguments: the first is compensatory justice—past injustices need to be undone and compensation should be given to those who were disadvantaged as a result of discriminatory traditions or intentional policies; the second is distributive justice—the social goods and wealth of a country should be distributed equally; and the third is social utility—everyone in a society has something important to contribute, and the common good is best served by everyone’s participation in the economic and social system.
You might also like to view...
Which of the following is represented by the most visually dominant design element?
A) The most controversial information B) The most complex information C) The most positive information D) The most colorful information E) The most important information
Terms such as “female doctor” or “male nurse” are examples of
a. labeling. b. spotlighting. c. sexism. d. stereotyping.
Shopping bots theoretically give pricing power to:
a. consumers. b. wholesalers. c. retailers. d. agents.
The U.S. Courts of Appeals has exclusive jurisdiction to enforce, set aside, or modify orders of the Federal Trade Commission
Indicate whether the statement is true or false