In the evidence-collection process, contamination of evidence occurs most commonly when evidence is not properly secured, is wrongfully mixed with other types of evidence, or is altered significantly from its original condition at the crime scene
What are the legal consequences if evidence is not handled properly? A. When this occurs, the evidence is usually rendered inadmissible or "incompetent" by the court.
B. The evidence is usually admissible but the officer may be impeached by defense counsel in the handling of the evidence.
C. The evidence may be admissible if officer can show that in "good faith" the errors were based on poor training or poor information at the time of collection.
D. The evidence is not admissible but officers and prosecution may still use the information to convict the suspect.
A
You might also like to view...
The term "delinquency" in a juvenile proceeding refers to behavior that would be classified as criminal if committed by an adult
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Gang involvement in political activities first originated in the 1960s
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Which of the following is the best interpretation of the Frye standard?
A. New scientific evidence is held to a higher standard because of its recent discovery. B. Unusual scientific evidence can be considered admissible only when three expert witnesses verify its validity. C. Unusual scientific evidence must be proven relevant and legally obtained before it can be considered admissible in court. D. New scientific evidence may be used in court only when it has gained general acceptance in the scientific community.
The duty of the Magistrate is:
a. To commission peace officers b. To preserve the peace within his/her jurisdiction c. Represent the state in criminal cases d. Report a warrant