Explain the significance of Nix v. Whiteside.
What will be an ideal response?
In Nix v. Whiteside (1986), the U.S. Supreme Court considered how an attorney should handle a situation where he or she knows that a client intends to commit perjury while testifying in his or her own defense. While all nine justices agreed that Whiteside's rights were not violated and also agreed that defense counsel should do all that he or she can to dissuade a client from committing perjury, only five justices joined in the majority's suggestions for dealing with potential client perjury. Chief Justice Burger wrote for the majority that an attorney faced with such a situation must reveal his or her client's conduct to the court and, if necessary, withdraw his or her representation. Under no circumstances should the lawyer permit or assist his or her client in giving false testimony.
You might also like to view...
The most popular form of constitutional review is judicial review with legislative approval
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
What is the Aum Shinrikyo group continuously obsessed with?
a. The occult b. Terrorism c. Biological warfare d. The apocalypse
This theory credits the propensity to commit crime to intimate peer groups which encourage favourable definitions to crime.
a. social disorganization theory b. radical criminological theory c. differential association theory d. general strain theory
Reasonable force can be thought of as the ________ degree of force necessary to protect oneself in the face of a substantial threat
Fill in the blank(s) with the appropriate word(s).