What are the limits on a "dogsniff" search for narcotics at a traffic stop?
What will be an ideal response?
In Illinois v. Caballes (2005), the Supreme Court confirmed that a dog sniff was not a search under the Fourth Amendment. This ruling reinforced law enforcement's ability to identify drug traffickers and users by using police K-9s in walk-around searches of vehicles stopped for traffic offenses. If, however, use of a drug-sniffing canine prolongs a stop, the dog sniff may become an illegal search.
You might also like to view...
Stereotyping in and of itself is an operational principle of life.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
A movement that includes reducing harsh sentences and liberalizing marijuana laws is called ______.
a. democratic socialism b. restorative justice c. penal help d. social justice activism
Which of the following is a characteristic of chronic juvenile offenders?
A. They have high I.Q. B. They have high educational attainment. C. They belong to a racial or ethnic minority group. D. They have a history of family problems that often involves some form of sexual abuse.
Common Law is based on precedent and therefore law is not written down in one place within this tradition
Indicate whether the statement is true or false