Federal Bank is a secured party on a $50,000 loan to Gigi, who owns Home HealthCare, an assisted living facility. When Gigiexperiences financial difficulty, creditors other than Federal Bank petition her into involuntary bankruptcy. The value of the

secured collateral has substantially decreased in value. On its sale, the debt to Federal Bank is reduced to $25,000. Gigi'sestate consists of $100,000 in exempt assets and $20,000 in nonexempt assets. After the bankruptcy costs and back wages to Gigi'semployees are paid, nothing is left for unsecured creditors. Gigireceives a discharge in bankruptcy. Later she decides to go back into business. By selling a few exempt assets and getting a small loan, she is able to buy Indulgence, a small, profitablenightclub. Gigigoes to Federal Bank for the loan. The bank claims that the balance of its secured debt was not discharged in Gigi'sbankruptcy. She signs an agreement to pay Federal Bank the $25,000, and the bank makes a new unsecured loan to her. Is Federal Bank correct that the balance of its secured debt was not discharged in bankruptcy? What is the legal effect of Gigi'sagreement to pay the bank $25,000 after the discharge in bankruptcy?


A secured creditor is entitled to priority to the proceeds from the dis¬posal of the secured collateral of the bankrupt debtor up to the amount of the debt owed. Should the proceeds not cover the secured debt, the secured party be¬comes an unsecured creditor for the balance. Unless the debtor is denied a dis¬charge in bankruptcy, all debts of the debtor are rendered void on the grant¬ing of the discharge. In this case, Federal Bank is incor¬rect. Federal Bank became an unsecured creditor to the balance of $25,000 owed. Gigi'sdischarge in bankruptcy discharged her obligation to pay the debt.
The Bankruptcy Code restricts the legality of reaffirma¬tions—agreements to pay debts discharged in bankruptcy. For these agree¬ments to be binding, they must be executed before the discharge in bankruptcy is granted. All reaf¬firmation agreements must be filed with the court. Unless the debtor (Gigi) is repre¬sented by an attorney, court approval is required. The court will only approve the reaf¬firmation if the agreement will not cause the debtor a hardship and is in her best interests. If Gigiis represented by an attor-ney, the attorney must file a declaration or affidavit stat¬ing that Gigiwas fully informed of the consequences, the agreement was voluntarily made, and the agreement does not impose a hardship on Gigior her de¬pendents. Gigihas a right to rescind this agreement. Because the reaffirma¬tion agreement in this case was made afterGigi'sdischarge in bankruptcy, she is not le¬gally obligated to pay the $25,000 debt previously discharged in bankruptcy.

Business

You might also like to view...

According to the Uniform Simultaneous Death Act, each deceased's property goes to the government in case of simultaneous deaths

Indicate whether the statement is true or false

Business

Which of the following statements is false?

A) Decision models selectively describe the managerial situation. B) Decision models consider all factors from the real world. C) Decision models designate performance measures that reflect objectives. D) Decision models designate decision variables.

Business

Which of the following defenses may be raised by an accountant under Section 11 of the 1933 Securities Act?

a. Privity and due diligence. b. Privity, but not due diligence. c. Due diligence, but not privity. d. Neither privity nor due diligence.

Business

Recent statistics show total union membership to be about 33 percent of the civilian labor force.

Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)

Business