A difference between the Slammer and Stuxnet worm was that the Slammer:
A. was introduced to the system via massive amounts of spam e-mail.
B. was less sophisticated than the Stuxnet.
C. attacked equipment made only by certain Iranian and Finnish manufacturers.
D. did not attack a nuclear power plant.
B. was less sophisticated than the Stuxnet.
The Slammer worm was introduced to the system via the corporate network using a SUB stick. Slammer had none of the sophistication of Stuxnet, but it highlighted a vulnerability in the system.
You might also like to view...
In multiparty negotiations, each party may be acting as a principal-that is, representing the interests of at least one other party, or as an agent-representing their own interests.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
Portia is a vegetarian and chooses not to eat meat based on moral and ethical rationales. Her employer is hosting a barbeque event, and all employees are expected to attend. Portia exercises her right of ______ when asking to be excused from the party.
A. life and safety B. free speech C. due process D. freedom of conscience (limited)
Which of the following factors increases pressures for local responsiveness?
A. Powerful buyers B. Uniformity in distribution channels C. Host government demands D. Similarities in customer tastes and preferences E. Competitors that are based in high-cost locations
In a situation involving undue influence, the party who is unduly persuaded to enter into a contract due to their mental, emotional, or physical weakness is called the ________.
A. servient party B. correspondent C. dominant party D. fraudster