If the government could tax all illegal activity to generate revenue for the state or federal treasury, would your analysis change?
What is the identifiable harm to society that laws prohibiting illegal gambling are designed to protect when so much gambling is legal? Does the support of state-sponsored lotteries or horse and dog race tracks detract from the argument that illegal gambling hurts society?
What will be an ideal response?
ANSWER: Answers may vary: This question is designed to engage the student's analysis of federal and state policy defining mala prohibita crimes if the state cannot financially benefit.
You might also like to view...
Answer the following statement(s) true (T) or false (F)
1. The medical model is a rehabilitation model that assumes criminals are sick and need treatment. 2. There was a boom in prison building across the country between 1950 and 1970. 3. Rehabilitation was the philosophy behind warehouse prisons. 4. Warehouse prisons were involved in the large-scale production of goods for sale in the open market. 5. The prevailing theme of corrections throughout American history has been money.
Based on the recommendations of a task force created by President ______, victim impact statements are now included at sentencing.
a. Obama b. Reagan c. Clinton d. Nixon
Identify a difference between evidence-based practice (EBP) and evidence-based corrections (EBC).
A. EBP works at preventing future crimes, while EBC works at reintegrating probationers into society. B. EBP focuses on the practical use of programs that have been found to be effective, while EBC is primarily concerned with study and evaluation. C. EBP uses empirical data, while EBC uses theoretical knowledge. D. EBP is defined according to immeasurable moral or value-oriented standards or beliefs, while EBC is defined according to practical realities.
The same rules of evidence that apply to criminal trials apply to grand jury investigations
Indicate whether the statement is true or false