Some historians argue that the South's states' rights philosophy helped defeat the South in the Civil War. Explain why there may be some substance to this claim

What will be an ideal response?


States' rights hindered a centralized coordination of military planning and operation, and the mobilization and utilization of resources and manpower in the Confederacy. Instead, attachment to states' rights promoted bickering and a non-cooperative attitude that hastened war weariness and undermined Southern will.

History

You might also like to view...

Which of the following is true of the nation building program and of counterinsurgency? a. These programs were based on the American assumption that the United States model of capitalism anddemocracy could be successfully transferred to other parts of the world

b. Each complimented the other and made it possible to place American aid in the hands of the people of theThird World who most needed that aid. c. The two ideas revived faith throughout the Third World that America was the exemplar of freedom anddemocracy. d. These programs drained money from all branches of the armed services, which were already underfunded.

History

White southerners who joined the Republican Party were called ____________________

Fill in the blank(s) with correct word

History

By 3100 B.C.E., what was the approximate population of Uruk, the first large city in Mesopotamia?

a. 1 million. b. 1,000. c. 10,000. d. 50,000. e. About 500,000.

History

Why didn't William Paterson's New Jersey Plan appeal to most delegates of the Philadelphia Convention?

A) It proposed a unicameral Congress in which the states would be represented equally, giving the states too much power. B) It proposed a two-house national legislature, giving the federal government too much power. C) It only represented the wishes of the smaller states, excluding the larger and more powerful states. D) It was strongly supported by Madison and his colleagues, so most delegates rejected it on that basis alone. E) It denied Congress power to tax or regulate trade, severely hampering its political and economic viability.

History