Explain why a risk averse individual will purchase full insure if a policy is actuarially fair, but only partially insure or not insure at all, if it is not. Use graphs to support your answer.

What will be an ideal response?


Risk averse individuals avoid risk if possible and thus may purchase insurance to protect themselves against risk. An insurance policy is actuarially fair if it's expected net payoff is zero and purchasing such a policy does not change an individual's expected consumption. Rather it raises it in times of loss and reduces it good times. A risk averse person will purchase full insurance if it is actuarially fair because it permits him to purchase a risky bundle without changing his expected consumption. An insurance policy is less than actuarially fair if the premium exceeds the promised benefit times the probability of loss and individuals' expected consumption falls. A risk averse individual will not fully insure when insurance is actuarially unfair because it reduces his expected consumption and makes him worse off. To be better off, as reflected by being on a higher indifference curve, the individual will partially insure or not insure at all, when insurance in actuarially unfair. The amount of less-than-actuarially-fair insurance bought depends upon the individual's level of risk aversion.

Economics

You might also like to view...

When households choose to hold money as a store of value, rather than holding assets such as certificates of deposit, stocks, and bonds, ________ demand for money results

A) liquidity B) asset C) transactions D) precautionary

Economics

If ________, net exports are zero

A) imports equal transfer payments B) imports exceed exports C) exports exceed transfer payment D) exports equal imports

Economics

Assume Jean-Claude purchased real estate for $500,000 using $50,000 of which is his own money and $450,000 which he borrowed at an 8% interest rate. If the value increased by 10% in one year and he sold the property, what was Joe's rate of return on his investment? If the value of the property had declined by 2%, what would have been the rate of return on his investment?

Economics

Assume both the demand for bagels and the supply of bagels increase. Which of the following outcomes is certain to occur?

A. The equilibrium quantity of bagels will rise. B. The equilibrium quantity of bagels will fall. C. The equilibrium price of bagels will fall. D. The equilibrium price of bagels will rise.

Economics