In U.S. v. White, involving incriminating statements heard by law enforcement because of warrantless electronic eavesdropping of defendant White's coconspirator, the Supreme Court held that:
a. live participant monitoring was reasonable under the Fourth Amendment, butelectronic eavesdropping was not
b. White had no reasonable expectation of privacy in his conversation with the co-conspirator.
c. three-party bugging jeopardizes our sense of security and therefore was unreasonable.
d. the use of government informants in the respondent's home violated the Fourth Amendment.
b
You might also like to view...
_________ represent police and correctional personnel have fought hard over the years to receive good pay and benefits packages
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word
Which term refers to certain synthetic substances with a chemical makeup similar to that of opioids?
a. antagonists b. antibodies c. agonists d. antigens
Soviet dictator Joseph Stalin committed _____ terrorism during a purge of Communist Party leaders threatened his reign. The result was thousands of executions
Fill in the blank(s) with the appropriate word(s).
How long do the behavioral/psychological effects of marijuana last?
A. 30 to 60 minutes B. 45 to 90 minutes C. 1 to 2 hours D. 2 to 3 hours