What did the United States Supreme Court determine in the case of Buckley v. Valeo?
A) that the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1974 was totally unconstitutional
B) that the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1974 was constitutional in its entirety
C) that the provision of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1974 that placed limits on independent expenditures made on behalf of candidates without their cooperation was unconstitutional
D) that the organizing of political action committees is a violation of the United States Constitution
E) that interest groups should be pluralistic in nature
C
You might also like to view...
Applying quotas on imports is a policy that would be followed by a __________
A) bureaucracy B) conspirator C) free-market capitalist D) protectionist state
Which of the following is true of the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) policy?
A. States determined whether a smaller or larger proportion of poor families were eligible. B. States under AFDC were given greater flexibility in administering welfare policies. C. States under AFDC need not spend any of their welfare dollars on monthly cash payments to families. D. It strengthened work requirements for recipients and limited the time that families can receive benefits. E. States under AFDC had the option to use both public and private agencies to administer welfare.
Describe the state's prison population reduction policy that was established by AB 109, the "Public Safety Realignment" law.
What will be an ideal response?
Which clause of Article 4 of the U.S. Constitution requires one state to recognize a divorce concluded in another state?
a. Due Process b. Full Faith and Credit c. Interstate Commerce d. Privileges and Immunities