What are the pros and cons of using group time to work on the issues between mutually hostile members?
What will be an ideal response?
The advantages of addressing the issues between mutually hostile members, when they agree to do so, are that they have a real opportunity to problem solve in a safe setting, become more accepting of others who are different than they are, and may build group cohesion. The disadvantages are that members may still strongly disagree on issues and make the group time a battleground. They may also disrupt the work of other members. When they can accept the differences between each other and "agree to disagree," then they should be given some time in group to work through their issues. Where this is not possible and the members remain hostile, one or both members may need to be asked to leave the group.
You might also like to view...
Describe the steps outlined by Hardy and Laszloffy (1995) for constructing a cultural genogram.
What will be an ideal response?
The following legislation is considered the "bible" of civil rights for persons with disabilities:
a. Civil Rights Act b. Rehabilitation Act of 1973 c. Kennedy Disability Act d. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Which of the following describes the purpose of the Response Summary on the Strong?
a. To allow an individual to compare his or her interests to the interests of same-sex individuals who are satisfied in their jobs b. To identify an individual's broad interest areas (e.g., science, math, music) c. To give a breakdown of client responses on the test d. To identify an individual's top three Holland Codes e. To give an estimate of work style, learning environment, leadership style, and risk taking/adventure
It is estimated that between ______ and ______ children die from abuse and neglect each year.
a. 1500, 3000 b. 1000, 2000 c. 2000, 3500 d. 2000, 4000