What was the Supreme Court's justification for overturning the separate-but-equal doctrine?
a. The Supreme Court did not have all of the facts when it adopted the separate-but-equal doctrine.
b. The separate-but-equal doctrine was never intended to apply to people.
c. The quality of life for African Americans in the South had deteriorated considerably since the adoption of the separate-but-equal doctrine.
d. Segregated schools stigmatize minority children.
Answer: d
You might also like to view...
In the realm of political judgment, the prudential component of political science is concerned with ________.
a. which public policies should prevail b. which public policies actually exist c. which public policies can be formulated and sensibly implemented d. things other than public policy
The five Great Powers of Europe in the nineteenth century were
a. Great Britain, France, Italy, Russia, and Prussia. b. Great Britain, France, Germany, Italy, and Russia. c. Great Britain, Austria, Prussia, Russia, and France. d. Great Britain, Austria, Prussia, Russia, and Italy. e. Austria, Prussia, Italy, Spain, and Russia.
What did the Texas Supreme Court rule regarding the public education system in the Edgewood v. Kirby case? How did the "Robin Hood" law represent a response to the ruling? Did that law "solve" the problem? Explain
What will be an ideal response?
Resources not belonging to any particular state and not falling under any particular state's jurisdiction are termed
a. natural resources. c. private goods. b. environmental goods. d. common-pool resources.