Why is MEG more useful than fMRI for studying participants' responses to quiet sounds?
A. MEG equipment is much cheaper and easier to use than fMRI equipment.
B. The magnets used in fMRI are very noisy, blocking the ability to sense quiet sounds.
C. MEG recordings of brain activity must be taken more slowly than fMRI images, allowing a more accurate assessment of brain activity.
D. Neither of these technologies is suitable for assessing participants' responses to sound.
Answer: B
You might also like to view...
Lakeshia is performing for a talent show by "reading" the thoughts of a "volunteer" from the audience. Lakeshia is showcasing the purported ability of
a. telepathy. b. precognition. c. clairvoyance. d. psychokinesis.
Your best friend is considering enrolling his son in day care. What advice would you offer him? What kinds of things should he look for in a high-quality day care?
What will be an ideal response?
Research on human pheromones should have what impact on a person's decision to purchase pheromone-based products to make themselves more attractive and desirable to others?
A) Human pheromones do not exist and pheromone-based products are therefore a waste of money. B) Human pheromones do exist and purchasing pheromone-based products is a useful way to influence others' interest in you. C) Human pheromones do exist, but purchasing pheromone-based products is not an effective way to influence others' interest in you. D) Human pheromones do exist, but the research on the usefulness of pheromone-based products is inconclusive.
A strength of field experiments is that the results are more likely to be representative of behavior in real-world settings than results obtained in a laboratory
Indicate whether the statement is true or false