In United States v. Ash, the Court addressed the issue of whether post-indictment photographic displays required the presence of counsel and held:
a. A post-indictment photographic displays is not a “critical stage” of the prosecution and is not entitled to the presence of counsel.
b. A post-indictment photographic displays is a “critical stage” of the prosecution but is not entitled to the presence of counsel.
c. A post-indictment photographic displays is not a “critical stage” of the prosecution but is entitled to the presence of counsel.
d. A post-indictment photographic displays is a “critical stage” of the prosecution and is entitled to the presence of counsel.
a. A post-indictment photographic displays is not a “critical stage” of the prosecution and is not entitled to the presence of counsel.
You might also like to view...
In rape cases, how is the concept of resistance determined?
What will be an ideal response?
The stage where the values and goals of the police department are articulated in the mission statement is in micro COP
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Discuss how the UK has, over thirty years, changed their terrorism laws to meet current challenges from Islamic terrorism
What will be an ideal response?
You are a prison official who, last year, was unsuccessfully sued by a prisoner for "deliberate indifference." A colleague of yours is facing threats of a similar situation. You believe that part of the problem that can lead to such threats, and even the possibility that such threats are true, is the lack of money spent on criminal justice. Why do you think this could be the case? What advice would you give to your colleague? Explain.
What will be an ideal response?