In State v. Miller, the court held that?
A. ?the trial judge's denial of the requested adjournment was not an abuse of his broad discretion and did not violate the defendant's constitutional right to effective representation.
B. ?Miller's right to be represented entailed the right to a public defender of his choice.
C. ?Miller's conviction should be reversed because the trial judge failed to accommodate a reasonable request for a brief delay so as to permit Miller an opportunity to confer with newly assigned counsel.
D. ?this was a rare case in which the doctrine of fundamental fairness mandated reversal of the defendant's conviction.
Answer: A
You might also like to view...
How do the rules pertaining to evidence differ between federal judicial trials and administrative hearings?
What will be an ideal response?
Under the subjective standard for entrapment, the question to be answered is:
A) Was a crime committed? B) Was the defendant predisposed to commit the crime? C) Would an innocent person be induced to commit the crime by the officer’s acts? D) Would a reasonable person be induced to commit the crime by the officer’s acts? E) Did the government agent commit the crime first?
T or F The most common method of resolving civil disputes is settlement.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
A divisible divorce is entitled to full faith and credit by another state only in part.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)