The ______ exception to the exclusionary rule allows evidence that was seized illegally to be admissible in court, when the evidence is obtained independent of the illegal police action.
A. inevitable discovery
B. independent source
C. good faith
D. purged taint
B. independent source
You might also like to view...
One of the earliest examples of corporate fraud on a national level involved the co-founder of Microsoft
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Answer the following statement(s) true (T) or false (F)
1. Police officer–involved shootings are rarely subject to a formal investigative review. 2. Police work is largely subject to supervisor oversight. 3. Body-worn cameras, while an advancement as far as technology in policing goes, are still subject to criticism. 4. Research suggests that managers can strive to overcome resistance by engaging officers in organizational change. 5. Pressure regarding recent instances of police use of force have largely come from within these organizations.
Arnold is in a local bar. After several beers, he begins to argue with other patrons regarding who has the best college football team in the state. Arnold loudly proclaims the virtues of his school
The bartender, realizing that Arnold is annoying many of the other customers, says, "Hold it down man or I will have to ask you to leave." Arnold loudly replies, "Screw you. I have just as much right to be here as anyone else." The bartender says, "That's it. Get out!" Arnold says, "I'm staying. Give me another beer." At that point, the bartender calls the police. Upon his arrival, the bartender tells the police officer that Arnold is refusing to leave the bar. Which of the following is correct about this situation? A) Arnold has a right to remain in the bar as it is a public place. B) The bartender has no authority to order Arnold to leave the bar because he is not the owner of the bar. C) Arnold is in violation of the criminal trespass statute only if he refuse to leave the bar upon orders of the police officer. D) Arnold is violating the criminal trespass statute because he was given notice to depart and failed to do so.
How does criminology cooperate with other disciplines to solve crimes?
What will be an ideal response?