Arnie Stoltz, a 16-year-old living in British Columbia, had had enough of high school. He approached Suzanne Vegan, a 55 year old master chef, to teach him how to be a chef
Suzanne charges $10,000 a year for the two year training program and agreed to allow Arnie to pay her the full amount one year after he completed the program. When Suzanne called on Arnie a year after he completed the training to collect the money, Arnie said he wouldn't pay a cent because he had been a minor when he signed the contract. Which of the following statements best describes Suzanne's legal position in this matter?
A) Arnie must pay because he is no longer a minor.
B) Arnie must pay because a minor must honour a contract for necessities (necessaries).
C) An apprenticeship contract is considered a necessity (necessary) and can be enforced against Arnie.
D) If Suzanne proves the apprenticeship contract was beneficial to Arnie he will have to pay a reasonable price for it.
E) Suzanne must only prove the apprenticeship contract was to Arnie's benefit to get her money
D
You might also like to view...
Which of the following is a form of social action in which a group’s values and identity are publicly demonstrated or enacted in a stylized manner, within the context of a specific occasion or event?
A. creations B. symbols C. rituals D. artifacts
A professor at a local university noted that the exam grades of her students were normally distributed with a mean of 73 and a standard deviation of 11. If 69.5 percent of the students received grades of C or better, what is the minimum score of those who received C's?
A. 70.39 B. 67.39 C. 50.39 D. 65.39
?The decisions made in creating a marketing mix are only as good as the organization's understanding of the target market.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
Briefly discuss the strategic implications of the crossing-the-chasm framework.
What will be an ideal response?