Discuss why the notion of intent is so central to the legal definition of crime, yet also complicated. Explain the four types of intent. In what situations may an individual be charged with and convicted of an offense without direct proof of criminal intent?
What will be an ideal response?
General Intent: The suspect intended to commit the crime but may not have intended the specific consequences.
Specific Intent: The suspect intended to commit the crime, and the specific consequences from the crime can be linked “specifically” to the criminal act.
Transferred Intent: An individual is held liable for the behavior of others on the assumption that the individual’s behavior contributed to the crime.
Criminal Negligence: Individuals fail to act in a reasonable way, and this failure to act can be connected to harmful results.
Individuals can be charged with and convicted of strict liability and vicarious liability offenses without direct proof of criminal intent.
You might also like to view...
Which is not an essence of homeland security:
a. consequences of an attack. b. prep for attack. c. response to it. d. untold casualties.
Which of the following is an example of imitation?
a. prostitution b. candy cigarettes c. methamphetamine use d. speeding on the expressway
The additive ammonia in tobacco, speeds the nicotine absorption in smokers.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
The crime scene investigator should avoid fundamental methods to measure the crime scene, since advanced data gathering systems are more accurate
Indicate whether the statement is true or false.