What is Stephen Flynn's argument regarding the national defense of the United States? Do you agree or disagree with Flynn? Explain your position
What will be an ideal response?
• Flynn says America has made two crucial mistakes.
• First, homeland security has been separated from national security.
• Second, the infrastructure is vulnerable to attack.
• Despite all the rhetoric and departmental rearrangements for homeland security, the reality is that the United States has not organized its resources for defense.
• Flynn argues that homeland security should be part of a national strategy to defend the United States.
• The United States has marshaled resources to fight overseas while neglecting to protect the home front.
• It is difficult to inspect all of the cargo containers arriving in seaports; therefore, the oceans represent an opportunity for terrorists.
• Flynn points out that very little has been done to protect the nation's 361 seaports.
• The nation's critical infrastructure remains open to attack, police and firefighter numbers have been cut even though they are crucial for security.
• Flynn also sees a problem in strategic thinking in DHS and other agencies; the federal government has virtually ignored private industry, claiming that it is responsible for protecting its own infrastructure.
• Flynn believes that jihadists are fully aware of vulnerabilities in the infrastructure.
• They will not simply let the United States bring the fight to them; they intend to strike, and the safest and most effective way to hit America is to strike the infrastructure.
You might also like to view...
The Incapacitation perspective on punishment views offenders as ______.
A. generally good people who have made bad decisions B. mentally ill who need treatment C. rational beings who weighed the cost and benefit of their crime D. wicked people who need to be separated from innocent
The U.S. Criminal Code provides penalties for first-time illegal copyright offenders of fifty years in prison and fines of up to ten million dollars
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Scientific evidence supports a belief that eyewitness identification is very credible, reliable, and responsible for solving many crimes
a. True b. False Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Was the search (entry) into Cost's pocket constitutional?
Police officer Davis, assigned as a housing authority agent, was patrolling a residential complex around 12:40 a.m. in December. He approached Darrio Cost, sitting in the passenger seat of a vehicle in a parking lot designated for housing complex residents. Cost immediately reached across his body toward his left front pants pocket. Davis asked Cost what he was reaching for, but Cost did not answer. Davis told Cost to get away from his pocket, but Cost reached toward the pocket again. Davis then directed Cost to exit the vehicle. Upon exiting the vehicle, Cost immediately told Officer Davis, "You can't search me, but you can pat me down." Davis conducted a "pat down" search of Cost for concealed weapons. In doing so, Davis immediately frisked the left front pants pocket toward which Cost had been reaching. When Davis touched the pocket, he felt numerous capsules inside. Davis reached into Cost's pocket and removed a plastic bag containing twenty capsules. Subsequent analysis of the contents of those capsules showed that they contained heroin. Davis contended that upon feeling the capsules in Cost's pocket he "knew" that they were heroin because "through my training and experience, I know that that's what heroin is packaged in." On crossexamination, Davis admitted that over-the-counter medications such as "Motrin, Tylenol, or something along those lines" are sometimes "packaged in capsules." What will be an ideal response?