Compare and Contrast Tennessee v. Garner and Graham v. Connor
What will be an ideal response?
The Garner decision declared unconstitutional a Tennessee statute that authorized police officers who give notice of the intent to arrest to "use all the necessary means to effect the arrest" if the suspect flees or resists.
Four years after Garner, the Supreme Court decided the landmark case of Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386 (1989), which set the standard for non-deadly force. The Court declared emphatically that all claims involving allegations of excessive force against police officers must be analyzed under the Fourth Amendment's reasonableness requirement. Further, the Court adopted a test of objective reasonableness to decide when excessive force is used. This requires focusing on what a reasonable police officer would do "without regard to [the officer's] underlying intent or motivation."
You might also like to view...
The mandated use of commercial products that could enable a police officer to remotely shut-off a vehicles engine would probably have a positive impact on which of the following?
A) Auto thefts B) Police pursuits C) both A and B D) neither A nor B
In addition to Russia, which other country used the concept of the vanguard to spark a revolution?
a. United States b. China c. Cuba d. Spain
The Wickersham Commission (1931) defined the _____ as "the inflicting of pain, physical or mental, to extract confessions or statements."
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word
Conflict theorists are likely to see police discretion with some amount of suspicion and distrust
Indicate whether the statement is true or false