One way to challenge or attack a legal position or argument based on a statute is to show that the different statute being relied on as a guide to interpret the applicable statute applies to such functionally different fact situations from the fact situation of the client's case that it cannot be used as a guide to interpret the statute being analyzed.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
True
Rationale: See "Counteranalysis-Techniques"
You might also like to view...
The unauthorized practice of law includes:
A. negotiating settlements and conducting client interviews. B. making strategy decisions in client matters and setting fees. C. accepting cases and assisting at depositions
?If a plaintiff seeks to recover damages allegedly caused by a physician's negligence (medical malpractice), and the physician is one of four partners in a medical practice partnership, the plaintiff could sue which of the following?
A. ?The physician who allegedly caused the harm B. ?The partnership C. ?One of the other physicians D. ?All of the other physicians E. ?All of these choices are correct.
What standard is used to determine whether government can use a person's alienage for purposes of discrimination in government employment?
A) necessary and compelling test B) government classification test C) employee privacy test D) important governmental functions test
Procedural fairness focuses on fairness at the end of the relationship
Indicate whether the statement is true or false