Discuss distributive justice in regard to social and economic resources. What are some of the arguments of proponents of distributive justice? Would you agree or disagree with distributive justice from a functionalist perspective? Why?
What will be an ideal response?
Distributive justice can be defined as being the relative equality in how social and economic resources are distributed in society. Proponents of distributive justice argue that government efforts should be applied to reduce or eliminate inequalities wherever they may exist, and that the wealthy should be made to pay their "fair share." Currently, the U.S. tax policy benefits those at the top while hurting those at the bottom. However, by taxing wealthy individuals in a more equitable manner, more resources can be distributed to those in need. The functionalist perspective would disagree with the arguments of distributive justice because they view inequality as being essential in the efficiency and maintenance of society.
You might also like to view...
Research suggests the transition to remarriage may, in fact, be more stressful to children than the transition to divorce, in part because the newly married parent is preoccupied with his or her new mate and children may feel neglected in the
transition. Indicate whether the statement is true or false
In explaining social inequality, functionalists ask which one of the following questions?
a. Who benefits from social inequality and at whose expense? b. How do people of different social statuses interact? c. How does society use inequality to affect social interaction? d. Why do the disadvantaged lack the work ethic needed to advance?
The size and wealth of a city can be estimated from satellite imagery
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
What is the mode of the following scores: 3, 4, 6, 7, 10, 10, 30, 10, 30, 4, 3, 8?
What will be an ideal response?