The quality of a discussion often depends on how closely the parties attend to the same issue. For the passage below, determine whether the speakers are clearly disputing the same issue, or whether somebody is missing the point.A: I think the oversight laws for police have to be toughened. Right now, it's difficult for society to protect itself against rogue cops.B: Well, I know you can't be convinced otherwise, but it just isn't true that every officer who's brought up on charges is guilty of those charges.
What will be an ideal response?
Different issues. We'd say B is missing A's point-even though what B says may be true.
You might also like to view...
Analyze the argument passage below, addressing the following as appropriate: specify the issues addressed; identify premises and conclusions; classify as inductive or deductive; supply missing premises; separate arguments from window dressing; identify claims better left unstated.The general population of the country has a favorable impression only of those members of the administration who get good press reviews, and Madelaine Albright, the Secretary of State, is the only current member of the administration who is getting good press. So she's the only one the country has a good impression of these days.
What will be an ideal response?
This festival commemorates the giving of God's commandments at Sinai
a. Yom Kippur b. Sukkot c. Shavuot d. Pesach
Express whether the phrase "never do evil that good may come of it" is the antithesis of a utilitarian sentiment. A. No, this phrase does not describe what is morally problematic aboututilitarianism because any moral theory will justify imposing some harm oninnocent people if the harm is insignificant or curable to secure the overallgood for others
B. No, this phrase does not describe what is morally problematic aboututilitarianism because any moral theory will justify imposing some harm oninnocent people even if the harm is irreparable if it secures the overall goodfor others. C. Yes, this phrase describes what is morally problematic about utilitarianism because no moral theory justifies imposing harm on innocent people to secure the overall good for others. D. Yes, this phrase describes what is morally problematic about utilitarianism because no moral theory will justify imposing some harm on innocent people even if the harm is insignificant or curable to secure the overall good for others.
Which of the following is a Rawlsian argument against discrimination?
A. Since the least advantaged in a society would be better off in a nondiscriminatory society than in one that discriminates, the rational person would see that nondiscrimination is morally preferable. B. People are treated as members of class with a certain characteristic, not as persons. They are not ends in themselves, but because of that characteristic, they are denied equal treatment and respect. C. The dominant class has a desire to maintain its superiority and its class prerogatives. D. Systematic discrimination produces a class of people who are arguably treated unjustly. Other groups in the society will also have cause to worry about whether they will be the next group to be discriminated against. On the whole, more harm than good is done.