Answer the following statement(s) true (T) or false (F)
1. According to your text, conscience is primarily a function of our upbringing.
2. The text claims that different people’s consciences can lead in contradictory directions.
3. The text argues that love alone is sufficient to resolve all moral issues.
4. According to the text, conscience, love, and the Golden Rule are worthy rules of thumb for ethics, but they have their limits.
5. The word "teleological" is related to a Greek word meaning "duty."
T 1. According to your text, conscience is primarily a function of our upbringing.
T 2. The text claims that different people’s consciences can lead in contradictory directions.
F 3. The text argues that love alone is sufficient to resolve all moral issues.
T 4. According to the text, conscience, love, and the Golden Rule are worthy rules of thumb for ethics, but they have their limits.
F 5. The word "teleological" is related to a Greek word meaning "duty."
You might also like to view...
How does During respond to the consume-or-decline argument? a. All of these choices b. He denies that a reduction in spending will cause a market failure. c. He notes that this argument is merely a fear tactic and that the alternative—to continue excessive consumerism—will bring an even greater decline
d. He notes that consumer economics is deeply flawed.
The words of the Yashts are recited during the Yasna ceremony
Indicate whether the statement is true or false.
Van den Haag argues that the death penalty is more feared than any other human
punishment and that the more feared a punishment is, the greater the deterrent impact it will have. How does Reiman respond to this claim?
a. He argues that capital punishment is not an effective deterrent, because criminals already put themselves at risk of death. b. He argues that there is little evidence that capital punishment works because few criminals engage in a cost?benefit analysis before they commit crimes. c. He argues that the less feared punishment may still be enough to deter anyone who can be deterred. d. All of the above
The drowning child scenario questions
a) whether we can ever really make a difference. b) whether making a difference can be justifiably limited to one's own nation. c) whether we have any obligation to make a difference in the lives of the poor. d) whether we have an obligation outside our own nation.