Which of the following comparisons of the descriptions "unacceptable" and "weak" in the Holistic Critical Thinking Scoring Rubric is correct?
(a) They both apply to attempts at critical thinking that fair-mindedly follow where evidence and reasons lead.
(b) They both apply to attempts at critical thinking that thoughtfully analyze and evaluate major alternative points of view.
(c) They both apply to attempts at critical thinking that fail to identify strong, relevant counterarguments.
(d) They both apply to attempts at critical thinking that do justify results but do not explain reasons.
c
You might also like to view...
Bacon and Kuhn agree that scientific observations must be theory-neutral
Indicate whether the statement is true or false.
Do you believe it is moral to execute someone who committed murder at age 16? At age
12?
What will be an ideal response?Which city's livestock and other wealth is confiscated by the Israelites after it is destroyed?
A. Hazor B. Ai C. Jericho D. Jerusalem
According to Spinoza, good and evil are
a. subjective evaluations. b. realities that exist in nature. c. whatever God commands them to be. d. known through rational intuition.