Explain why repeated measures designs can be more useful than nonrepeated measures designs when participants provide subjective ratings. Why are objective measures less problematic in nonrepeated designs?
What will be an ideal response?
When participants engage in subjective ratings, as on a Likert-type scale, each person brings his or her own perspective to the judgment task. There is no guarantee that two different people will have the same subjective rating perspective. With objective measures, we rely less on personal perspectives and instead focus on more externally verifiable behaviors.
You might also like to view...
According to Barnard, the job of the leader was to ______.
a. effectively acquire and wield power over the labor force b. administer authority over clients and workers alike c. secure the cooperation of those within the organization d. delegate authority to specialized workers and supervisors
The Brownlow Report ______.
A. was eagerly accepted by a Democratic Congress that wanted to ensure that President Roosevelt would have all the help he needed to enact the New Deal B. was ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court, and this led President Roosevelt to propose significant changes to the Court C. was stymied by legislative gridlock and President Roosevelt was forced to rely on his executive authority to get the help he needed D. ignored the fact that the Constitution withholds the kind of authority from the President that CEOs typically enjoy, and Congress initially rebuffed the proposal and only relented to a scaled-down proposal
The ability to monitor any form of communication by a suspect
A. is known as a roving wiretap. B. is known as an extracommunicative warrant. C. still protects the privacy of individuals with whom a suspect communicates. D. has not raised any serious civil liberties controversy. E. is consistent with Fourth Amendment protections.
What percentage of Americans receive news from radio?
A. 18 B. 25 C. 37 D. 67