In Hudson v. Michigan (2006), Detroit police did not knock before entering the defendant's home with a warrant. Instead, they announced themselves and waited for only three to five seconds before making their entrance. In this case, the Court stated that:
A. the search was inadmissible because the officers were not in hot pursuit.
B. improper knock and announce is not enough to disqualify evidence uncovered on the basis of a valid search warrant.
C. improper knock and announce is unreasonable enough to provide defendants with immunity under the Fourth Amendment.
D. because of exigent circumstances, the police officers did not need to announce themselves.
Answer: B
You might also like to view...
In a self-fulfilling prophecy, the social–psychological and practical consequences of official labeling thus lead to _____, or the commission of continued deviance and the adoption of a deviant lifestyle
a. Criminal consistency b. Positivist magnification c. Deviance amplification d. Violence variation
One goal of Intermediate Punishment Programs is to achieve a lower rate of recidivism than standard probation programs
a. True b. False
By raising Type I error to .05 from .10, the general effect on Type II error is to increase it
Indicate whether the statement is true or false.
ACA accreditation is a review to identify whetherthe procedures prescribed bypolicy are consistently beingcarried out by staff membersin their daily duties
Indicate whether the statement is true or false