Define the term employment at will. How have court decisions and statutes affected "at-will" employment over time? Where might a paralegal find information regarding his or her employer's policies on employment termination??
What will be an ideal response?
Traditionally, employment relationships have been governed by the common law doctrine of employment at will. Under this doctrine, employers may hire and fire employees "at will"-that is, for any reason or no reason. Today, courts have created several exceptions to this doctrine, and state and federal statutes now regulate some aspects of the employment relationship. Under federal law (and state statutes), employers may not refuse to hire job applicants, refuse to promote employees, or fire employees for discriminatory reasons-because of the employee's age, gender, or race, for example.The employer's policy manual likely deals with the subject of employment termination. The policy manual will likely specify what kinds of conduct can serve as a basis for firing employees. The manual will also probably describe termination procedures. Most large law firms have special policies and procedures that an employee must follow with respect to claims of employment discrimination.
You might also like to view...
The requirement that a plaintiff in a defamation cause show that the statement was made by the defendant knowing it was false or with reckless disregard for its truth or falsity defines the essential element of
a. publication b. intent c. actual malice d. per quod
The major difference between a “health care proxy” and a health care surrogate is:
a. the health care proxy can vote with the medical team on whether or not to resuscitate. b. the health care proxy is not necessarily named by the declarant, but is authorized by state law to make health care decisions for an individual. c. there is no difference in any of the states concerning them. d. both b and c
Why did the court in Ragan find that the issue was moot?
What will be an ideal response?
Settlement offers:
A. Are a bad strategy for the plaintiff B. Should be rejected frequently because the court frowns upon settlements C. Are made by the defendant to avoid litigation D. Can be quite costly for the plaintiff E. All of the above