n which of these instances would the charge of corporate murder be least appropriate?
a. workers for a corporation drying from exposure to toxic chemicals while on a job site.
b. an airplane company deliberately failing to make routine inspections company-wide due to a staffing shortage.
c. a corporate truck driver accidentally rear ending a stopped car on the turnpike.
d. a car company knowingly installing faulty parts in order to cut corners
c. a corporate truck driver accidentally rear ending a stopped car on the turnpike.
You might also like to view...
Loansharks supply loans to
a. white collar workers b.gamblers c.drug dealers d.only b and c e.all of the above
Officer Smith places Alice under arrest. Officer Smith the searches Alice’s persons including inside her pockets and the purse she is carrying. Officer Smith has Alice empty her pockets and finds methamphetamine in the contents of Alice’s pockets. Officer Smith charges her with the additional charge of possession of narcotics. Alice’s attorney moves to suppress the evidence as the product of an illegal search. Will the suppression motion be successful?
a. Yes, if the search was conducted without probable cause that Alice might be carrying narcotics. b. Yes, while a search of Alice’s person without a warrant may have been warranted, the extension of the search to the contents of Alice’s pockets exceeded the permissible scope of Terry, making it an illegal search. c. No, applying the holding in Chimel, the requiring of Alice to empty her pockets following a lawful arrest would be permissible both for officer safety and to prevent the destruction of contraband. d. No, applying the holding in Chimel, once a person is placed under lawful arrest, the person loses any reasonable expectation of privacy and a search of his or her person is permissible under the Fourth Amendment.
What three areas do an inquiry into whether an individual is being subjected to a probable cause arrest rather than to a reasonable suspicion stop focus on, as evidence by the Court’s ruling in Florida v. Royer?
What will be an ideal response?
D was arrested without a warrant and without probable cause. The police also failed to advise D of her Miranda rights. The trial judge should: a. dismiss all charges because of violations of D's constitutional rights. b. dismiss all charges because an illegal arrest deprives the court of jurisdiction to put D to trial onthe charges
c. dismiss all charges as required by Miranda. d. not dismiss the charges even though the police violated D's Fourth and Fifth Amendment rights.