Which of the following statements is true about the Supreme Court ruling in Rodriguez v. United States?
A. The Court ruled that the Nebraska police officer had overstepped the boundaries of his authority.
B. The Court held that the judicial determination of probable cause must be made within forty-eight hours after the arrest.
C. The Court ruled that the Nebraska police officer had the right to search Rodriguez's vehicle without a warrant on the grounds of probable cause.
D. The Court held that the Fourth Amendment protects people, not vehicles, houses, papers, and effects.
Answer: A
You might also like to view...
Criminal justice administration has evolved as society evolved
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Beat officers are also a vital part of our safety, for all but which one of the following reasons?
a. They know their neighborhoods. b. They track identity theft and fraud. c. They can provide shelter and protection for key policymakers. d. They develop trusted local sources.
In 2015, most terrorist incidents were perpetrated via ______.
A. automatic weapons B. poisonous gas C. computers D. explosives
What do the police need to articulate in order to obtain a "no-knock" warrant? a. The consent of the person for whom the arrest warrant is for. b. That the "Fair Warning" doctrine be employed. c. The persons were armed with automatic weapons and explosives, otherwise a no-knock warrant is notpermissible
d. That knocking (announcing their presence) would be dangerous, futile, compromise the investigation, andallow for the destruction of evidence.