Given the preference orderings listed above, what would the result be of a pair-wise contest between the spending choices medical and tax cut?
Now assume that Councillor 3 has to take a family member to the emergency room and has a very poor experience with the level of medical care provided at the local hospital. This leads her to view improving medical care as a higher priority than improving education in the municipality, if money is to be spent improving any programs. Councillors 1 and 2 do not change their preference orderings. Thus, the councillors now have the following preference orderings over the spending choices:
Councillor 1: Education, Medical, Tax cut
Councillor 2: Medical, Tax cut, Education
Councillor 3: Tax cut, Medical, Education
Assume that the councillors hold a round-robin tournament that pits each alternative against every other alternative in a series of pair-wise votes. The winner is the alternative that wins the most contests. Based on this information, answer the following four questions.
A. education
B. medical
C. tax cut
D. It would be a tie.
B. medical
You might also like to view...
Most scholars believe that we have not experienced a major realignment since __________
Answer:
In most states where judges are elected, judges can accept campaign contributions from plaintiffs, defendants, their lawyers, and political action committees
a. True b. False Indicate whether the statement is true or false
If public administrators have mastered the techniques of planning, implementation, and evaluation, they do not need to be concerned with understanding the political and ethical context of their work
a. True b. False
Quasi-experimental designs cannot be used to draw causal conclusions because
a. quasi-experiments do not use measured variables. b. measurements in quasi-experiments are not accurate enough. c. quasi-experiments use partial only counterbalancing. d. pre-existing differences among groups could be the cause of differences between groups.