How does the "fruit of the poisonous tree" doctrine operate in the confessions/interrogations context?
What will be an ideal response?
A confession will be thrown out, as was the decision in Miranda v. Arizona, if a suspect's incriminating statement is a result of custodial interrogation in which the suspect was not advised of his or her constitutional right to have counsel present. Before custodial interrogation can commence, suspects must be advised of their so-called Miranda rights.
You might also like to view...
A __________ analyst's job may include identifying factors contributing to a crime pattern
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word
Tammy Ayres and Yvonne Jewkes conducted a small-scale analysis of press coverage in ______ in 2012.
a. the United Kingdom b. Russia c. France d. Denmark
Federal authorities have agreed that careless investment practices were a major contributing factor to the savings and loan implosion.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
The Fourth Amendment has been held to apply to schoolchildren in public schools. If a public school principal wanted to search the backpack of a student,
A) the public school principal could insist upon conducting a search for any reason or for no reason so long as the student was on a school property. B) the police would have to become involved and actually make the search in order to protect the rights of the student under the Fourth Amendment. C) the public school principal would need to notify the student's parents and would have to obtain the student's consent. D) the public school principal would have to process reasonable suspicion that the student possessed items that violate law or that offend a school rule. E) the public school principal would have to possess reasonable suspicion that the student possessed items that violate the law or that offend a school rule and would have to obtain a search warrant in order to make a lawful search.