Summarize the Supreme Court's view on the proper scope of a frisk
What will be an ideal response?
A number of cases have focused on the permissible scope of a frisk, and three important limits have been imposed. First, a frisk can be nothing more than a pat-down of someone's outer clothing. Groping or squeezing is not permissible. Second, a frisk must be motivated by the desire to promote officer safety, not by the desire to seek out any form of contraband. That is, the sole purpose of a Terry pat-down is to protect the officer from weapons that might be used by the suspect during the encounter. Finally, for an officer to legally seize an item during the course of a frisk, that item must be immediately apparent to the officer as contraband.
You might also like to view...
Which factors has the Supreme Court considered in determining the appropriate duration of a stop?
A) The public interest served by the seizure B) The nature and scope of the intrusion C) The objective facts upon which the law enforcement officer relied D) All of the above
Russian organized crime traffics women for the sex industry
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Which of the following would not be an example of problem analysis?
a. find the most cost effective manner to maintain prison capacity at established levels b. determine the most efficient manner in assigning felony cases to circuit judges c. determine the average sentence given for those convicted of armed robbery within the state of Georgia d. what is the best manner to reduce the response time by police officers in calls for service
Gaps or weaknesses in the protection of an organization's assets are _____________________.
Fill in the blank(s) with the appropriate word(s).